Draft Open Space & Recreation Strategic Plan
Consultation has concluded
Thank you for you interest, this consultation is now closed.
The draft 'Open Space and Recreation Strategic Plan' aims to provide Council with policy direction over the next 10 years in the planning, provision, management and investment relating to ‘open space’ sporting and recreation facilities and services for both our residents and visitors.
The way our community uses local recreation facilities and open space is changing. There are significant challenges to providing the diverse range of open spaces and recreation in the City.
Also, some of the facilities are ageing and do not meet modern standards. Council has insufficient resources to maintain or renew all of the current facilities as is.
There are opportunities for the new ways of providing and using open space and recreation facilities in the future, in a way that meets community needs in the fairest way possible.
Residents are encouraged to be part of the conversation about the future of open space and recreation in the Blue Mountains and to have your say.
- View: The draft Open Space & Recreation Strategic Plan and supporting documents in the 'Document Library' to the right.
Thank you for you interest, this consultation is now closed.
The draft 'Open Space and Recreation Strategic Plan' aims to provide Council with policy direction over the next 10 years in the planning, provision, management and investment relating to ‘open space’ sporting and recreation facilities and services for both our residents and visitors.
The way our community uses local recreation facilities and open space is changing. There are significant challenges to providing the diverse range of open spaces and recreation in the City.
Also, some of the facilities are ageing and do not meet modern standards. Council has insufficient resources to maintain or renew all of the current facilities as is.
There are opportunities for the new ways of providing and using open space and recreation facilities in the future, in a way that meets community needs in the fairest way possible.
Residents are encouraged to be part of the conversation about the future of open space and recreation in the Blue Mountains and to have your say.
- View: The draft Open Space & Recreation Strategic Plan and supporting documents in the 'Document Library' to the right.
Use this section to ask questions
-
Share Does BMCC accept that the climate is warming and that the current trend towards hotter summers will continue? on Facebook Share Does BMCC accept that the climate is warming and that the current trend towards hotter summers will continue? on Twitter Share Does BMCC accept that the climate is warming and that the current trend towards hotter summers will continue? on Linkedin Email Does BMCC accept that the climate is warming and that the current trend towards hotter summers will continue? link
Does BMCC accept that the climate is warming and that the current trend towards hotter summers will continue?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoCouncil does recognize that climate change is occurring and that the planet is steadily warming.
-
Share The Federal Govt Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010 and the Anti Discrimination Act requires access to pools for the disabled, along with the provision of an aquatic wheel chair. 1.2 metres (the shallow end) is well over the head of a person in a wheel chair, meaning that the single 25 metre pool will not comply with any legislation. How will BMCC address this? on Facebook Share The Federal Govt Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010 and the Anti Discrimination Act requires access to pools for the disabled, along with the provision of an aquatic wheel chair. 1.2 metres (the shallow end) is well over the head of a person in a wheel chair, meaning that the single 25 metre pool will not comply with any legislation. How will BMCC address this? on Twitter Share The Federal Govt Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010 and the Anti Discrimination Act requires access to pools for the disabled, along with the provision of an aquatic wheel chair. 1.2 metres (the shallow end) is well over the head of a person in a wheel chair, meaning that the single 25 metre pool will not comply with any legislation. How will BMCC address this? on Linkedin Email The Federal Govt Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010 and the Anti Discrimination Act requires access to pools for the disabled, along with the provision of an aquatic wheel chair. 1.2 metres (the shallow end) is well over the head of a person in a wheel chair, meaning that the single 25 metre pool will not comply with any legislation. How will BMCC address this? link
The Federal Govt Disability (Access to Premises - Buildings) Standards 2010 and the Anti Discrimination Act requires access to pools for the disabled, along with the provision of an aquatic wheel chair. 1.2 metres (the shallow end) is well over the head of a person in a wheel chair, meaning that the single 25 metre pool will not comply with any legislation. How will BMCC address this?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoA hoist can be used to assist a person in a wheelchair into the water. The hoist can be stopped at a suitable point to allow the person to swim out of the chair or for a carer to assist the person out of the chair. If the person is a non-swimmer or needs support in the water it is common for a lifejacket to be worn and for the carer to be in the water to support the person.
Please see the FAQ: How do our aquatic centres and pools cater for people with a disability? which outline which facilities currently meet disability standards.
-
Share The draft plan makes it clear that BMCC thinks that it is perfectly reasonable for children to make the transition from a splash-pad to a 1.2 metre deep 25 metre pool as a progression in their learn-to-swim journey. This measure is dangerous because 1.2 metres (about 4ft) is the depth at which the majority of Infant school children will have their heads under water and some Primary age children will have only their head above water. A few steps toward the deep end and the consequences for weak or non-swimmers will result in drownings. What is the BMCC response to this? on Facebook Share The draft plan makes it clear that BMCC thinks that it is perfectly reasonable for children to make the transition from a splash-pad to a 1.2 metre deep 25 metre pool as a progression in their learn-to-swim journey. This measure is dangerous because 1.2 metres (about 4ft) is the depth at which the majority of Infant school children will have their heads under water and some Primary age children will have only their head above water. A few steps toward the deep end and the consequences for weak or non-swimmers will result in drownings. What is the BMCC response to this? on Twitter Share The draft plan makes it clear that BMCC thinks that it is perfectly reasonable for children to make the transition from a splash-pad to a 1.2 metre deep 25 metre pool as a progression in their learn-to-swim journey. This measure is dangerous because 1.2 metres (about 4ft) is the depth at which the majority of Infant school children will have their heads under water and some Primary age children will have only their head above water. A few steps toward the deep end and the consequences for weak or non-swimmers will result in drownings. What is the BMCC response to this? on Linkedin Email The draft plan makes it clear that BMCC thinks that it is perfectly reasonable for children to make the transition from a splash-pad to a 1.2 metre deep 25 metre pool as a progression in their learn-to-swim journey. This measure is dangerous because 1.2 metres (about 4ft) is the depth at which the majority of Infant school children will have their heads under water and some Primary age children will have only their head above water. A few steps toward the deep end and the consequences for weak or non-swimmers will result in drownings. What is the BMCC response to this? link
The draft plan makes it clear that BMCC thinks that it is perfectly reasonable for children to make the transition from a splash-pad to a 1.2 metre deep 25 metre pool as a progression in their learn-to-swim journey. This measure is dangerous because 1.2 metres (about 4ft) is the depth at which the majority of Infant school children will have their heads under water and some Primary age children will have only their head above water. A few steps toward the deep end and the consequences for weak or non-swimmers will result in drownings. What is the BMCC response to this?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoBlue Mountains City Council pools implement the Royal Lifesaving Society Keep Watch at Public Pool Guidelines. These guidelines do require a parent/guardian to be in the water with arms reach of children 5 years and younger and non-swimmers. For children 6-10 years constant active parental supervision is required.
Parents would be encouraged to be in the water with their weak or non-swimming children in the 25m pool.
-
Share At page 8 of the Annual Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as a community service not intended to make a profit. Government policy requires that subsidies provided to customers, and the funding of those subsidies, must be explicitly disclosed. In the case of Blackheath pool, the subsidy is $12.60. The Royal Life Saving Society puts a dollar value of $27 in health gains in relation to swimming. Why is the dollar value of swimming not considered relevant in shaping the policy? on Facebook Share At page 8 of the Annual Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as a community service not intended to make a profit. Government policy requires that subsidies provided to customers, and the funding of those subsidies, must be explicitly disclosed. In the case of Blackheath pool, the subsidy is $12.60. The Royal Life Saving Society puts a dollar value of $27 in health gains in relation to swimming. Why is the dollar value of swimming not considered relevant in shaping the policy? on Twitter Share At page 8 of the Annual Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as a community service not intended to make a profit. Government policy requires that subsidies provided to customers, and the funding of those subsidies, must be explicitly disclosed. In the case of Blackheath pool, the subsidy is $12.60. The Royal Life Saving Society puts a dollar value of $27 in health gains in relation to swimming. Why is the dollar value of swimming not considered relevant in shaping the policy? on Linkedin Email At page 8 of the Annual Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as a community service not intended to make a profit. Government policy requires that subsidies provided to customers, and the funding of those subsidies, must be explicitly disclosed. In the case of Blackheath pool, the subsidy is $12.60. The Royal Life Saving Society puts a dollar value of $27 in health gains in relation to swimming. Why is the dollar value of swimming not considered relevant in shaping the policy? link
At page 8 of the Annual Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as a community service not intended to make a profit. Government policy requires that subsidies provided to customers, and the funding of those subsidies, must be explicitly disclosed. In the case of Blackheath pool, the subsidy is $12.60. The Royal Life Saving Society puts a dollar value of $27 in health gains in relation to swimming. Why is the dollar value of swimming not considered relevant in shaping the policy?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoThe report produced by the Royal Life Saving Society estimates the value to health provided by 60 minutes of vigorous physical activity such as lap swimming or 120 minutes of low intensity exercise such as snorkeling. There is an extensive body of research into health benefits from physical activity.
Council's Draft Plan recognizes the economic, and health and social benefits provided by an active lifestyle, and proposes to continue investment in a wide range of facilities to support and encourage all members of our community participate in the activities they prefer. The facilities which would provide these health benefits include swimming pools as well as playing fields and courts, skateparks, and tracks and trails.
-
Share At page 8 of the Special Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as Category 2 (where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million). Given that income from swimming pools is over $4 million (page 3 - Net cost of services) why is it not listed as a Category 1 business activity and what is the significance of this? on Facebook Share At page 8 of the Special Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as Category 2 (where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million). Given that income from swimming pools is over $4 million (page 3 - Net cost of services) why is it not listed as a Category 1 business activity and what is the significance of this? on Twitter Share At page 8 of the Special Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as Category 2 (where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million). Given that income from swimming pools is over $4 million (page 3 - Net cost of services) why is it not listed as a Category 1 business activity and what is the significance of this? on Linkedin Email At page 8 of the Special Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as Category 2 (where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million). Given that income from swimming pools is over $4 million (page 3 - Net cost of services) why is it not listed as a Category 1 business activity and what is the significance of this? link
At page 8 of the Special Financial Statements, Aquatic Centres are defined as Category 2 (where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million). Given that income from swimming pools is over $4 million (page 3 - Net cost of services) why is it not listed as a Category 1 business activity and what is the significance of this?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoThe section this question refers to states explicitly:
Category 2
(where gross operating turnover is less than $2 million and/or the business activity is not intended to make a profit)
a. Aquatics
Council’s Aquatic Centres (a community service not intended to make a profit)
vs.
Category 1
(where gross operating turnover is over $2 million)
As Aquatic Centres DO NOT MAKE A PROFIT, isn’t it self-explanatory that Aquatics is listed under Category 2?
Operating income of over $4M is facing Operating expenses of over $7M and the overall service (including Capital expenditure) is subsidised by the General Fund by $3.4M in 2016/17 (as stated on page 3).
Please refer to the Special Purpose Financial Statements’ Background sections (page 1), which states:
Background
These Special Purpose Financial Statements have been prepared for the use by both Council and the Office of Local Government in fulfilling their requirements under National Competition Policy.
The principle of competitive neutrality is based on the concept of a ‘level playing field’ between persons/entities competing in a market place, particularly between private and public sector competitors.
Essentially, the principle is that government businesses, whether Commonwealth, state or local, should operate without net competitive advantages over other businesses as a result of their public ownership.
For Council, the principle of competitive neutrality and public reporting applies only to declared business activities.
These include (a) those activities classified by the Australian Bureau of Statistics as business activities being water supply, sewerage services, abattoirs, gas production and reticulation, and (b) those activities with a turnover of more than $2 million that Council has formally declared as a business activity (defined as Category 1 activities).
In preparing these financial statements for Council’s self-classified Category 1 businesses and ABS-defined activities, councils must (a) adopt a corporatisation model and (b) apply full cost attribution including tax-equivalent regime payments and debt guarantee fees (where the business benefits from Council's borrowing position by comparison with commercial rates).
Hypothetically, if Aquatic Centres were classified as Category 1, they would need to :
be a completely separate corporate entity
be a fully self-funded unit, i.e. operate under full cost-recovery
charge entry fees to reach break-even (market prices)
show their full operations in a different way of presenting Financial Statements
and they could not be subsidised by the General Fund.
Currently entry fees are heavily subsidised by the general ratepayer.
-
Share What records were kept of daily attendance figures during the period from 1st January 2018 to date in relation to all the swimming pools in the Blue Mountains l.g.a. and are they available? If not, why not? on Facebook Share What records were kept of daily attendance figures during the period from 1st January 2018 to date in relation to all the swimming pools in the Blue Mountains l.g.a. and are they available? If not, why not? on Twitter Share What records were kept of daily attendance figures during the period from 1st January 2018 to date in relation to all the swimming pools in the Blue Mountains l.g.a. and are they available? If not, why not? on Linkedin Email What records were kept of daily attendance figures during the period from 1st January 2018 to date in relation to all the swimming pools in the Blue Mountains l.g.a. and are they available? If not, why not? link
What records were kept of daily attendance figures during the period from 1st January 2018 to date in relation to all the swimming pools in the Blue Mountains l.g.a. and are they available? If not, why not?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoVisitation January 2018
Please see below the total visitation on each day at each centre during January to date. This is a record of total visitors during the operating hours. The operating hours at each site does vary, the pools operate between 9hrs -14hrs each day.
Blackheath
Katoomba
Lawson
Springwood
Glenbrook
1st
325 302
264
366
423
2nd
127
381
208
411
279
3rd
14
389
57
451
169
4th
41
323
60
381
188
5th
158
468
228
602
444
6th
393
469
424
458
432
7th
505
661
649
729
554
8th
172
523
269
616
338
9th
64
436
172
443
234
10th
14
497
34
438
144
The maximum recorded people in the water at any one time on Sunday 7th January 2018
Blackheath - 145 people in the water across all pools at 4:00pm
Katoomba - 149 people in the water across all pools at 4:00pm
Lawson - 179 people in the water across all pools at 4:00pm
-
Share Could you please advise me of the closing time for submissions. on Facebook Share Could you please advise me of the closing time for submissions. on Twitter Share Could you please advise me of the closing time for submissions. on Linkedin Email Could you please advise me of the closing time for submissions. link
Could you please advise me of the closing time for submissions.
Valma_r asked over 6 years agoReceipt of submissions close by 5pm on Monday 15th January 2018.
-
Share If only 115 people are allowed in the water at Blackheath at any time if the 25 metre pool is the only pool available, how will staff monitor and police these numbers? The document you refer to from NSW Health requires that where water depth is greater than 1.5 metres, bather load is 1 bather per 4 sq metres. In the 25 metre pool at Blackheath, this equates to 62 people. How is your Swimmer Capacity calculated at 115 people given that you are required to follow relevant legislation and guidelines? on Facebook Share If only 115 people are allowed in the water at Blackheath at any time if the 25 metre pool is the only pool available, how will staff monitor and police these numbers? The document you refer to from NSW Health requires that where water depth is greater than 1.5 metres, bather load is 1 bather per 4 sq metres. In the 25 metre pool at Blackheath, this equates to 62 people. How is your Swimmer Capacity calculated at 115 people given that you are required to follow relevant legislation and guidelines? on Twitter Share If only 115 people are allowed in the water at Blackheath at any time if the 25 metre pool is the only pool available, how will staff monitor and police these numbers? The document you refer to from NSW Health requires that where water depth is greater than 1.5 metres, bather load is 1 bather per 4 sq metres. In the 25 metre pool at Blackheath, this equates to 62 people. How is your Swimmer Capacity calculated at 115 people given that you are required to follow relevant legislation and guidelines? on Linkedin Email If only 115 people are allowed in the water at Blackheath at any time if the 25 metre pool is the only pool available, how will staff monitor and police these numbers? The document you refer to from NSW Health requires that where water depth is greater than 1.5 metres, bather load is 1 bather per 4 sq metres. In the 25 metre pool at Blackheath, this equates to 62 people. How is your Swimmer Capacity calculated at 115 people given that you are required to follow relevant legislation and guidelines? link
If only 115 people are allowed in the water at Blackheath at any time if the 25 metre pool is the only pool available, how will staff monitor and police these numbers? The document you refer to from NSW Health requires that where water depth is greater than 1.5 metres, bather load is 1 bather per 4 sq metres. In the 25 metre pool at Blackheath, this equates to 62 people. How is your Swimmer Capacity calculated at 115 people given that you are required to follow relevant legislation and guidelines?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoThe safe capacity is calculated at Blackheath acknowledging the varying depths of water we have in our 25m pool.
We calculate
12.5m x 15m as greater than 1.5m deep (Based on 4m2) 46 people and
12.5m x 15m as less than 1.5m deep (Based on 2.7m2) 69 people
Total capacity = 115 people
Reaching capacity at Blackheath pool is rare however our maximum recorded people in the water this season was recorded on Sunday 7th January when 145 people were recorded as in the water at 4pm. Management strategies to manage capacity would implemented as required at these times
-
Share At http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf it states: "6.6.1 Restricting bather load and encouraging bather hygiene Restricting bather loads and encouraging bathers to toilet and shower before using a public pool is important for maintaining water quality. Filtration systems are designed for a maximum bather load and this limit should not be exceeded. The bather load should be expressed and documented by the pool designer." What is the BMCC response to this? on Facebook Share At http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf it states: "6.6.1 Restricting bather load and encouraging bather hygiene Restricting bather loads and encouraging bathers to toilet and shower before using a public pool is important for maintaining water quality. Filtration systems are designed for a maximum bather load and this limit should not be exceeded. The bather load should be expressed and documented by the pool designer." What is the BMCC response to this? on Twitter Share At http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf it states: "6.6.1 Restricting bather load and encouraging bather hygiene Restricting bather loads and encouraging bathers to toilet and shower before using a public pool is important for maintaining water quality. Filtration systems are designed for a maximum bather load and this limit should not be exceeded. The bather load should be expressed and documented by the pool designer." What is the BMCC response to this? on Linkedin Email At http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf it states: "6.6.1 Restricting bather load and encouraging bather hygiene Restricting bather loads and encouraging bathers to toilet and shower before using a public pool is important for maintaining water quality. Filtration systems are designed for a maximum bather load and this limit should not be exceeded. The bather load should be expressed and documented by the pool designer." What is the BMCC response to this? link
At http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf it states: "6.6.1 Restricting bather load and encouraging bather hygiene Restricting bather loads and encouraging bathers to toilet and shower before using a public pool is important for maintaining water quality. Filtration systems are designed for a maximum bather load and this limit should not be exceeded. The bather load should be expressed and documented by the pool designer." What is the BMCC response to this?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoAs answered in previous question Council follows these guidelines and monitors swimmer number in our pools to ensure compliance with the guidelines, and to ensure adequate turnover of water to maintain water quality.
-
Share The Department of Health in Western Australia (at http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports%20and%20publications/PDF/CODE-OF-PRACTICE-AQUATIC-FACILITIES.pdf) has released a document providing a Code of Practice for Aquatic Facilities in that State. At page 52 of the document is a table relating to Maximum Bather Numbers and a figure of 3.5 sq/m is used. If that figure is applied to the Blackheath pool (as a reasonable guide), it means that in a 250 sq/m pool, only 71 people at any time would be permitted to use the pool. My question is this: does BMCC have any legal obligation, or any condition imposed by its insurance company, to limit the number of bathers in a 25 metre pool? What is the name of the BMCC insurer in this regard? on Facebook Share The Department of Health in Western Australia (at http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports%20and%20publications/PDF/CODE-OF-PRACTICE-AQUATIC-FACILITIES.pdf) has released a document providing a Code of Practice for Aquatic Facilities in that State. At page 52 of the document is a table relating to Maximum Bather Numbers and a figure of 3.5 sq/m is used. If that figure is applied to the Blackheath pool (as a reasonable guide), it means that in a 250 sq/m pool, only 71 people at any time would be permitted to use the pool. My question is this: does BMCC have any legal obligation, or any condition imposed by its insurance company, to limit the number of bathers in a 25 metre pool? What is the name of the BMCC insurer in this regard? on Twitter Share The Department of Health in Western Australia (at http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports%20and%20publications/PDF/CODE-OF-PRACTICE-AQUATIC-FACILITIES.pdf) has released a document providing a Code of Practice for Aquatic Facilities in that State. At page 52 of the document is a table relating to Maximum Bather Numbers and a figure of 3.5 sq/m is used. If that figure is applied to the Blackheath pool (as a reasonable guide), it means that in a 250 sq/m pool, only 71 people at any time would be permitted to use the pool. My question is this: does BMCC have any legal obligation, or any condition imposed by its insurance company, to limit the number of bathers in a 25 metre pool? What is the name of the BMCC insurer in this regard? on Linkedin Email The Department of Health in Western Australia (at http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports%20and%20publications/PDF/CODE-OF-PRACTICE-AQUATIC-FACILITIES.pdf) has released a document providing a Code of Practice for Aquatic Facilities in that State. At page 52 of the document is a table relating to Maximum Bather Numbers and a figure of 3.5 sq/m is used. If that figure is applied to the Blackheath pool (as a reasonable guide), it means that in a 250 sq/m pool, only 71 people at any time would be permitted to use the pool. My question is this: does BMCC have any legal obligation, or any condition imposed by its insurance company, to limit the number of bathers in a 25 metre pool? What is the name of the BMCC insurer in this regard? link
The Department of Health in Western Australia (at http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/Reports%20and%20publications/PDF/CODE-OF-PRACTICE-AQUATIC-FACILITIES.pdf) has released a document providing a Code of Practice for Aquatic Facilities in that State. At page 52 of the document is a table relating to Maximum Bather Numbers and a figure of 3.5 sq/m is used. If that figure is applied to the Blackheath pool (as a reasonable guide), it means that in a 250 sq/m pool, only 71 people at any time would be permitted to use the pool. My question is this: does BMCC have any legal obligation, or any condition imposed by its insurance company, to limit the number of bathers in a 25 metre pool? What is the name of the BMCC insurer in this regard?
stoplaughing asked over 6 years agoCouncil's insurers require Council to follow relevant legislation and guidelines. Council does follow relevant guidelines for NSW and staff monitor swimmer numbers in our pools to ensure safe swimming conditions are maintained. These numbers relate to people in the pool at any one time, and each centre and the overall grounds have a larger capacity.
See the guidelines and the swimmer capacity of each pool below:
http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/Publications/swimming-pool-and-spa-advisory-doc.pdf
Swimmer Capacity in each pool where changes are proposed in the Draft Strategic Plan.
Blackheath Pool
25metre pool
115 people in the water
Free form pool
143 people in the water
Toddlers
24 people in the water
Total Capacity
282 people in the water
Katoomba Sports and Aquatic Centre
Indoor 25metre
143 people in the water
Indoor tots
6 people in the water
Spa
6 people in the water
Outdoor 50metre
224 people in the water
Outdoor learners
24 people in the water
Outdoor tots
24 people in the water
Total Capacity
427 people in the water
Lawson Swim Centre
50metre pool
231 people in the water
Learners
33 people in the water
Toddlers
22 people in the water
Total Capacity
286 people in the water
Document Library
- Aquatic Facility Audit - Katoomba Outdoor Facilities (3.37 MB) (pdf)
- Blackheath Pool Structural Report on Leisure and Wading Pools (9.47 MB) (pdf)
- Draft Open Space & Recreation Strategy Document (36.8 MB) (pdf)
- Draft Play Guidelines (16.9 MB) (pdf)
- Katoomba Sports and AC Redevelopment Opportunity Report (2.73 MB) (pdf)
- Review of Aquatic Facilities: Expert opinion on Options (8.62 MB) (pdf)
- Maps - BMCC Open Space Recreation in the Blue Mountains (5.99 MB) (pdf)
- Random Residents Recreation Survey 2016 Report, Jetty Research (2.74 MB) (pdf)
- Specialist Recreation Surveys Report 2016, Jetty Research (3.03 MB) (pdf)
- 2009-NCW 06 - KT:MS - Additional Technical Docs 2 for Blackheath Pool Balance Tank (6.47 MB) (pdf)
- 2009-NCW 06 - KT - Additional Technical Docs Blackheath Balance Tank (2.78 MB) (pdf)
Key Dates
-
17 October 2017
-
25 October 2017
-
15 January 2017
FAQ
- POOLS - Q: What is the current level of service?
- POOLS - Q: What is the visitation to the pools?
- POOLS- Q: What is the length of current seasons?
- POOLS - Q: What investment has occurred since 2000?
- POOLS - Q: What is the Proposed Service Hierarchy for pools?
- POOLS - Q: What is the proposed new level of service level?
- POOLS - Q: Why would you consider closing a pool?
- POOLS - Q: Why haven’t the pools been maintained?
- POOLS - Q: Why would you consider closing Katoomba Outdoor pool?
- POOLS - Q: What is wrong with the pools – what does the Pool is failing mean?
- POOLS - Q: Can the Katoomba Outdoor pools filtration system be upgraded without renewing the whole facility?
- How do our aquatic centres and pools cater for people with a disability?
- POOLS - Q: How many carnivals are held at each centre?
- POOLS - Q: Can the school carnivals currently held at Katoomba be accommodated at Lawson Swim Centre?
- POOLS - Q: Would the Special Swim Scheme run by the Department of Education continue in the indoor pool if Katoomba Outdoor pools were closed?
- POOLS - Q: Will the Upper Mountains have sufficient pools to cater for the future demand?
- POOLS - Q: What is a splash pad and what are the benefits?
- POOLS - Q: How is a splash pad safer?
- POOLS - Q: How does a splash pad provide an education and fun sensory experience?
- POOLS - Q: Will the plans for a Splash pad at Lawson impact the children learning to swim?